National-Socialism, Liberalism, Marxism

Source: Metapedia (Archive)

Devotees and adulators of liberalism often compare National Socialism with Marxism, stating they are similar. However, considering the essence of the two systems, they are not similar. The same people try to say liberalism is better to live in than National Socialism. This is also not true for several reasons.

Finally, it is interesting to compare Marxism with liberalism. Both systems are products of a minority that wishes to lay dry, suppress, and finally eliminate the nation. Among shallow differences, their similarity are obvious: both squander the nation’s property while cooking their own soup. Considering the essence, the two systems are rather similar.

National socialism



Inner peace: National socialism wants to realize a universal socialism for the whole nation. Liberalism praises diversity and supports minorities, it tries to disaggregate the nation into elementary parts, rather than to unite it. Marxism praises class socialism, which means a harsh inner fight.
Higher lordship: National Socialism is bound to transcendency. It accepts and believes the existence of a higher might that steers the universe. It keeps the belief, and also the church can work, if it accepts the national-socialistic state. Liberalism is materialistic. It tolerates religion, but does not support a state religion. It supports religious diversity, and wherever possible, it tries to disorganize Christian faith. Marxism is a materialistic, atheistic ideology. It chases all religions except the Jewish one.
Ownership: National Socialism keeps the producing tools in private hands, but it states, that the aim of production is to be useful for the nation. With other words, production advances the society, and with it life gets easier and nicer. Liberalism also keeps the producing tools in private hands, however the purpose of production is solely to make the owners richer. Marxism forbids producing tools in private hands, with this it completely suppresses the individual, therefore there is no harmony between the individual and the society.
Economy: National Socialism prefers national products and production against foreign ones, therefore the system economically also supports the existence of the national state. Liberalism supports motion of materials and goods without limit, opposes protection of local production, eliminates customs duty, supports multinational companies. Therefore it endangers inner production and national life. Marxism socializes economy, it aims instead of national production an international-Bolshevistic economy. With this it ravages local production and cripples commerce.
Honor of work: National Socialism supports work on every level. It stops fraud and usury using hard rules, while prizing and honoring every kind of productive and creative work. It also honors the stay-at-home working woman and mother, who cares for her children. Liberalism supports usury and fraud indirectly by not really stopping it by proper regulations. It gives almost free hand to banks to ransack people through usury and financial tricks. Bolshevism creates a stone age, underdeveloped economy, in which neither physical, nor intellectual work is honoured, and it pays starvation wages for all, except for the foreign clique, that usurps the country. .
Family: National Socialism supports a rational social system, especially free schooling up to the university degree, or professional master degree. The frame of medical attendance is created in a way, that medical care is high quality and available for everyone. Liberalism supports family very little, if possible, it eliminates all social care, like schools and medical care. With this it undermines the culture and health of the nation. Bolshevism explicitly attacks family, it forces women to work due its starvation-wage system, and aims to raise children in state supported groups, hoping that they become brainless supporters of bolshevism. Bad school system and medical care undermines the culture and health of the nation. By using compulsory immunization or compulsory marriage advisement, and things like it, intervenes into the most private life of the people.
Housing: National Socialism considers as one of its most important task to provide good quality and payable housing for the people, providing enough living area for each person. It provides, therefore, a very effective construction program that is combined with a family aid program. With this, after 3 or four children, young families do not have to pay interest any more, and also part of their debt is released. Liberalism supports housing, but it does not stop effectively usury and speculation. Therefore it is easily possible that people use their housing due to debts. Bolshevism knowingly refuses all support for housing. People cannot pay for housing from their starvation wages; the Bolshevistic state knowingly stops the development of public utilities and also construction licenses are hard to achieve. The state builds solely bad quality block of flats providing very little living area for a person, and to maintain such block flats is very expensive due to bad construction quality and bad heating systems.
Support of the people: National Socialism considers the state as the property of the people, and it considers each member of the society as valuable person. It does not throw money out the window to support “minorities”. Minorities are given a fair chance to become a useful part of the nation by assimilation. Liberalism does not give any support to the members of the nation. In opposite, it is minority-centric, and aims that members of the majority give most of the result of their work to unwanted aliens for immigration and dwelling. Besides that, it gives money to cultural degeneration and wars for alien purposes. Bolshevism does not give any support to members of the nation. In opposite, it supports “proletariat internationalism”, members of the nation are harshly drained, and hordes of aliens are imported, as “proletarians to be supported”.
Justice: The national socialistic state refuses to use roman right only, since it prefers material things over human life and moral. National socialist states use national justice that gives human life and moral at least the same weight, which material things have. The liberal state uses roman right, that is clearly of materialistic nature. Anglo-Saxon justice uses juror-system, that means, a group of laymen decides over cases, which makes it similar to the Bolshevistic people’s courts. The Bolshevistic state is clearly a state without real justice system that is worth of this name. Laws are not publicly known, and the “courts” often decide not by law, but by decrees of the party. Lawyers are not independent, they are treated, as if they were employees of the lawyers’ chamber, and they ar often browbeaten by the state. Typical Bolshevistic establishment is the so called “people’s court”, whose leader is a Bolshevistic (blood)justice, who together with several laymen judges typically people with fabricated accusation to many years prison or to death.
Election system: National Socialism is a leader system. The leader nominates the main administrative personal. The people’s opinion is asked directly before important decisions by a voting. In liberalism there are multiple parties in the parliament, and the ones, that received the most votes, rule the country. Seemingly it is very democratic, however, in reality Zionist powers sitting in the background rule in reality using their grabbed money, built in media personal and other stooges. Real national people are pursued with yelling “right-wing”, and they have no chance in a liberal state. Bolshevism allows typically only one party, the Bolshevistic one. Voting is nominal, but compulsory. Here the parliament will be put together, however, it has no decision power. Decisions are made by the inner circle of the Bolshevistic party.
Individual freedom: National socialistic state does not limit the individual freedom, if a person does not pursue activity, which is again the state or the nation. Liberalism does not limit the individual freedom, but if there are people, who dislike the liberal state and they openly say it, or break one of its taboos, like the holocaust mythos, it will punish them for even over 10 years imprisonment just for saying that. Liberal media casts every day hate propaganda against self-driven “terrorism”. Marxism suppresses all individual freedoms, it provides complete censorship, no travelling is possible for average people, only the favourites of the nation-alien system can travel, especially to the “west”. Bolshevism turns the home of the people to a kind of prison or working camp with this rule.
Associations: National socialistic state allows all associations, that are not foreign steered (like scouts), and are not enemies of the national socialistic state or the nation. The national socialistic associations (Hitler-Jügend, NSDAP, SS) are nationalistic and constructive organizations. The liberal state allows associations that are not too national oriented from its point of view. It prefers to prohibit national organizations. It gives horrendous amounts of many to protect perverse associations’ organisations, like the marches of exhibitionistic homosexuals. The Bolshevistic state tolerates only Zion-Bolshevistic organisations, like the young pioneers, the communist youth organization the party and the Bolshevistic “unions”. It forbids and chases any other association especially the Christian associations.
Information for the people: National socialistic state informs the people about all events of the world. It does not hinder the movement of information except if the information providers want to destroy the state or the nation from inside. Liberal information is broad, however the information sources are typically Zionistic, and the informations are one sided and biased. Bolshevistic information policy is based on filtering and modifying the informations. Lots of information is suppressed, others are formed into Bolshevistic propaganda text. It tolerates only bolshevistic press. Even the private usage of typewriters or copying machines is limited or forbidden.
Police force: National socialism works with a relative small police corp. Members of the police force behave correctly. Liberal police force behaves generally correctly. In a number of cases they show helpless in case of outrage, especially, when “minorities” push around against natives. Bolshevistic police force is trained for brutality and hatred of the people. Bodily outrage by police force is common, instead of protecting the people the protect the ruling foreign clique.
Culture: National socialism supports native culture that stems from the nation; it provides high quality culture and arts. Liberalism supports multi-culture, which leads to the elimination of the state building nation. It eagerly supports all kinds of degeneration in culture and in arts, there are exhibitions of pictures, that even an ape could have easily painted, liberalistic films parrot hate of the nation and love for the alien and the perverted. They also eagerly support all kind of sexual perversions. Bolshevism provides a primitive and one sided culture. All written has to praise Marxism, and also art go down to the same level.
Sports: National socialism considers sports as a mean to become happier and healthier. Sport is available for everybody, and is supported by the state. It is not a business and not a mean to help aliens to infiltrate the national socialistic state. Liberalism considers sports as a business and as a mean to help to infiltrate the state by aliens. Even the national teams are filled with aliens of different races. Considerable money is used to protect sport events, which are more similar to a circus than to a mean to help people to stay healthy and happy. Bolshevism considers sport to be a mean for propaganda. It supports elite sport, and not mass sport. Sport is the only legal way for people to travel abroad, therefore young people are eager to became sport stars. The state itself is highly dishonest. It states, sport stars are amateurs, even though they nominally have a job, but in reality they do sports all the day.
International cooperation: National socialism wishes the cooperation of equal nations, its ideology is not based on hatred, since it will cooperate constructively with anyone except of conscious internal parasites. Liberalism does all the time liberal propaganda, it considers liberal or sometimes Bolshevistic states as preferred partners, it fantasizes about “western values”, and at the same times, states, that see through its unfair play, are considered as “enemies” and they try to eliminate these states with propaganda or with war. Bolshevism advertises hatred against all non-Bolshevistic states, calling them “imperialistic” or suppressor”, while among the Bolshevistic countries it prefers unprincipled “comrade love” based on adulation.

The End of the Jewish Century

The historian, Yuri Slezkine, of Russian-Jewish origin called the twentieth century the Jewish century. That’s right! It started with the „Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. It is completely immaterial that they were and still are described by Jews as a forgery. To prove that this is the case they would have to present an unaltered original or other author. To this day this has not been done. From out present vantage point, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, instead we can in retrospect verify the step by step achievement of the procedures shown in the protocols. It is about the enforcement of the NWO (New World Order), by the chosen people. It is also about the destruction of Germany.

As early as 1889 plans were being made for the downfall of the three European empires at the Congress, Paris which was also celebrating the centenary of the French Revolution. Records and reports of this Masonic congress reminiscing about the French Revolution are found in writing, and particularly explicit in the 1890 published Christmas edition of the British magazine „The Truth” entitled „The Kaiser’s dream”.

World War I began in 1914 with the murder of the heir to the throne of the aged Austrian Emperor. It ended with the murder of the Russian Tsar and his family, and the fall of the Austrian and Prussian-German Emperor. At the same time the Bolshevik revolution took place in Russia, which in Petersburg alone 1917/18 resulted in a loss of more than 1.3 million inhabitants – by shooting, starvation and whilst fleeing. A Bolshevik orgy of slaying swept through Russia in those days.

In the West, the Entente Powers, in particular President Wilson with his fourteen points, lured the Germans into the so-called peace trap, that is to lay down their arms. It was followed by the Versailles Diktat and the plundering of Germany accompanied by the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians through hunger and unemployment in the ensuing years of peace. However, the spiritual power and the will of the German people to survive were not finally defeated. In 1933 the Third Reich of the National Socialists arose, who identified the real enemy of the world, which in that same year led to a new declaration of war.

From then on the Germans – and not only the government – were spoken of as World Enemy Number One. The mutual destruction of the nation was therefore considered appropriate. This time it was the unsustainable conditions in Poland caused by Versailles which were the reason.

World War II in particular claimed millions of human lives; a war in which almost the whole world fought for 5. years against Germany and its few allies. Till today no peace treaty has been signed.

Most German cities were largely razed to the ground, more than a quarter of German territory was handed over to foreign powers, and the Germans who had lived there for centuries expelled. During this expulsion of about fifteen million Germans – equivalent to the entire population of Scandinavia – some 2.5 to 3 million civilians, mostly women and children and old people, were bestially murdered. Were they ever compensated by the countries that evicted them, or the murderers and bomber pilots held accountable?

Worse than this was the adopted re-education of the German people and being overrun by foreigners in their own country.

Despite all these measures after a relatively short time the Federal Republic of Germany – a product of the victorious powers – became a leading economic power in central Europe. The citizens built their ruined cathedrals and cities again. They integrated the millions of displaced persons and through unprecedented hard work the general prosperity grew once again to the dismay of the globalists.

In Russia at the twentieth Party Congress in 1956 Nikita Khrushchev introduced de-Stalinization. To this day in Russia the current Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin has been trying to clean up the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution that, in addition, poisoned men’s souls. His main opponents are the oligarchs of the present day. By comparison, in the Federal Republic of Germany the people with the greatest influence on the masses are the media moguls. They have degraded people to consumers and voting cattle for the elites. In the USSR and particularly after its collapse in the Ukraine, in their pathological greed the oligarchs plundered the rich provinces.

Since the late seventies the Holocaust has taken centre stage in providing moral justification for this ideology of Jewish world supremacy. Its symbol is the millions of Jews gassed in the extermination camp Auschwitz.

However, the symbol has already collapsed on itself as a result of a large number of would-be survivors of this place of horror that have been unmasked as phoney, as well as a number of scientific investigations. There are also the newly published “Commander’s and Headquarter’s Orders in the Concentration Camp Auschwitz 1940-1945” that an official body, the Institute for Contemporary History, has published in Munich. From all this it can be seen that Auschwitz was a labour camp for the production of armaments and not an extermination camp. However, from that it should not be concluded that appalling incidents had not taken place in concentration camps – and that the whole world over – nor that in Auschwitz there were not thousands of dead resulting from a variety of reasons as were happening at the time all over Germany.

But the question arises: „Where were the six million Jews gassed or murdered as is still claimed in the courts and in the media?” These victims are still commemorated on the 27th. January. The German people and the world at large has a right to know where this allegedly greatest crime of the Germans occurred. Neither the legal Paragraph 130 nor the expression „Offenkundig” (obvious) suffice to explain this. What we need is a public pro and contra discussion especially by experts and scientists if we want to claim to uphold the rule of law and to stand for truth and justice.

A peaceful future in which people live happier than in the Jewish Century, in which all our ecological problems can finally be collectively tackled, responsibly and sustainably, cannot be achieved on the basis of lies, nor under the continued rule of capitalism.

The US, in conjunction with Israel and NATO, are now actually provoking a Third World War. They cannot do this alone, however the globalists have many willing and well rewarded henchmen in their service. But they are and will remain a small minority. Perhaps with this war-mongering they want to divert attention from their big lies?

– We will not participate!

– We want truthful clarification!

– Since we live in the Christian West we stand for justice, and forgiveness and tolerance are not alien to us.

– We reject the principal of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth unto the third and fourth generation.

Only then can we achieve an end to this appalling Jewish century. Will we become aware of our power, the power of the powerless in their great majority and resist by confronting the wiles of the devil and his temptations?

11.07.2014                                                                   Ursula Haverbeck